- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-697/21: Action brought on 26 October 2021 — FC v EASO
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TN0697
62021TN0697
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
3.1.2022
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 2/46
(Case T-697/21)
(2022/C 2/64)
Language of the case: Greek
Parties
Applicant: FC (represented by: B. Christianos, A. Skoulikis and G. Kelepouri, lawyers)
Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (EASO)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision of the Authority Empowered to Conclude Contracts of Employment (AECE) of EASO No EASO/EDD/2021/112 of 25 July 2021 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant on 26 March 2021 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;
—order EASO to pay all the costs incurred by the applicant.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is vitiated by infringement of the applicant’s rights of defence.
2.Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is vitiated by infringement of the right to sound administration.
3.Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is vitiated by infringement of the applicant’s right to effective judicial protection.
4.Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is vitiated by infringement of the general principle of procedural economy.