EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-151/21: Order of the General Court of 25 March 2022 — Saure v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech SE COVID-19 vaccines — Initial refusal — Act not open to challenge — Application to modify the form of order sought — Assessing the admissibility of an action at the time it was brought — Manifest inadmissibility)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TB0151

62021TB0151

March 25, 2022
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

7.6.2022

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/28

(Case T-151/21) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)

(Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Commission correspondence concerning the quantity and delivery timings of BioNTech SE COVID-19 vaccines - Initial refusal - Act not open to challenge - Application to modify the form of order sought - Assessing the admissibility of an action at the time it was brought - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2022/C 222/47)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Hans-Wilhem Saure (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Partsch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Spina, K. Herrmann and G. Gattinara, agents)

Re:

By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks to have set aside the letter of the European Commission of 27 January 2021 rejecting an initial application for access to certain documents.

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.

Language of the case: German.

* * *

(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 189, 17.5.2021.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia