EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-140/24: Action brought on 4 March 2024 – Xilin Gol League Xiyang Mutton Industry/EUIPO – Baidu Europe (baidu)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0140

62024TN0140

March 4, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/2786

29.4.2024

(Case T-140/24)

(C/2024/2786)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Xilin Gol League Xiyang Mutton Industry Co. Ltd (Inner Mongolia, China) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, J. Rodríguez-Fuensalida y Carnicero, P. Ramells Higueras, A. Figuerola Moure and P. Muñoz Moreno, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Baidu Europe BV (Swalmen, Netherlands)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark baidu – European Union trade mark No 5 398 847

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 January 2024 in joined cases R 373/2023-5 and R 391/2023-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Uphold the present action for annulment brought against the contested decision;

Assess the erroneous application of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in the contested decision;

Declare the trade mark at issue revoked for all the goods and services in classes 9, 38 and 42;

Order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the applicant’s representation costs, associated with these proceedings.

Plea in law

Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/2786/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia