I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(2022/C 198/24)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: NB (represented by: J.-N. Louis, avocat, N. Maes, avocate)
Other party to the proceedings: Court of Justice of the European Union
The appellant claims that the Court should:
—set aside the order under appeal;
and, giving judgment itself,
—annul the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union not to appoint her to Grade AST10 for appointment/promotion/‘reclassification’ exercise 2014-2018;
—in any event, order the respondent to pay the costs at both instances.
In support of her appeal, the appellant claims that the General Court committed a manifest error of assessment in deciding that the action was inadmissible.
She also claims that the procedure put in place by the institution for the implementation of the 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations as regards appointment/promotion from Grade AST 9 to Grade AST10 is unlawful.
—