- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-264/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 13 April 2018 — P. M., N. G.d.M., P. V.d.S. v Ministerraad
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CN0264
62018CN0264
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-264/18)
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: P. M., N. G.d.M., P. V.d.S.
Defendant: Ministerraad
Question referred
Is Article 10(c) and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 ‘on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC’ compatible with the principle of equal treatment, whether or not read in conjunction with the principle of subsidiarity and with Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, since the services mentioned therein are excluded from the application of the procurement rules in the aforementioned Directive which nevertheless guarantee full competition and free movement in the procurement of services by public authorities?
(1) OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.
*
(<span class="note"><a id="t-C_2018276EN.01001501-E0001" href="#c-C_2018276EN.01001501-E0001">1</a></span>) Language of the case: Dutch.