- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-413/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 September 2017 — Intel Corp. v European Commission, Association for Competitive Technology Inc., Union fédérale des consommateurs — Que choisir (UFC — Que choisir) (Appeal — Article 102 TFEU — Abuse of a dominant position — Loyalty rebates — Commission’s jurisdiction — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 19)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CA0413
62014CA0413
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 374/2
(Case C-413/14 P) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017374EN.01000201-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017374EN.01000201-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>
((Appeal - Article 102 TFEU - Abuse of a dominant position - Loyalty rebates - Commission’s jurisdiction - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 19))
(2017/C 374/02)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Intel Corp. (represented by: D. Beard QC, and by A. Parr and R. Mackenzie, Solicitors)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Christoforou, V. Di Bucci, M. Kellerbauer and N. Khan, acting as Agents), Association for Competitive Technology Inc. (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, avocat), Union fédérale des consommateurs — Que choisir (UFC — Que choisir)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 12 June 2014, Intel v Commission (T-286/09, EU:T:2014:547);
2.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
3.Orders that the costs be reserved.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2017374EN.01000201-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017374EN.01000201-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 295, 10.11.2014).