- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-388/09: Action brought on 2 October 2009 — Rosenruist v OHIM (Representation of two curves crossed at one point inserted on a pocket)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0388
62009TN0388
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
21.11.2009
Official Journal of the European Union
C 282/62
(Case T-388/09)
2009/C 282/115
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant(s): Rosenruist — Gestão e serviços, Lda (Funchal, Portugal) (represented by S. Gonzáles Malabia and S. Rizzo, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
—Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 June 2009 in case R 237/2009-2; and
—Order the defendant to pay its own costs and those of the applicant
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The mark representing two curves crossed at one point inserted on a pocket for goods and services in classes 18 and 25
Decision of the examiner: Refused the application for a Community trade mark
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/94 (which became Article 7(1)(b) of Council Regulation 207/2009) as the Board of Appeal wrongly found that the Community trade mark concerned lacked inherent distinctiveness.