- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-274/20: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2021 — MHCS v EUIPO — Lidl Stiftung (Shade of the colour orange) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative EU mark depicting a shade of the colour orange — Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Examination of the facts of the EUIPO’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Nature of the mark — Colour mark — Right to be heard — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0274
62020TA0274
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
8.11.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 452/34
(Case T-274/20) (*)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative EU mark depicting a shade of the colour orange - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Examination of the facts of the EUIPO’s own motion - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Nature of the mark - Colour mark - Right to be heard - Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001)
(2021/C 452/40)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: MHCS (Épernay, France) (represented by: O. Vrins and B. Raus, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Kefferpütz and K. Wagner, lawyers)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2020 (Case R 2392/2018-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Lidl Stiftung & Co. & MHCS.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 February 2020 (Case R 2392/2018-1);
2.Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by MHCS;
3.Orders Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by MHCS.
(*)
Language of the case: English
ECLI:EU:C:2021:140