- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-685/14: Order of the General Court of 17 July 2015 — EEB v Commission (Environment — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Commission decision concerning the notification by Bulgaria of a transitional national plan as referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions — Refusal of internal review — Measure of individual scope — Aarhus Convention — Period allowed for commencing proceedings — Lateness — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TB0685
62014TB0685
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
16.11.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 381/36
(Case T-685/14) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Environment - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Commission decision concerning the notification by Bulgaria of a transitional national plan as referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU on industrial emissions - Refusal of internal review - Measure of individual scope - Aarhus Convention - Period allowed for commencing proceedings - Lateness - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any foundation in law))
(2015/C 381/42)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Podskalská, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin, S. Petrova and G. Wilms, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application, first, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2014) 2002 final of 31 March 2014 on the notification by the Republic of Bulgaria of a transitional national plan referred to in Article 32 of Directive 2010/75/EU, on industrial emissions, and, secondly, for annulment of the Commission Decision of 11 July 2014 (Ares (2014) 2317513) declaring inadmissible the applicant’s request that the Commission review its decision of 31 March 2014.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed.
2.There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to intervene of the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
3.European Environmental Bureau (EEB) shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.
4.EEB, the Commission, the Parliament and the Council shall each bear their own costs relating to the applications to intervene.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 431, 1.12.2014.