EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-236/24: Order of the General Court of 28 January 2025 – Ponsatí i Obiols v Parliament (Institutional law – Member of the Parliament – Privileges and immunities – Request for immunities to be defended – Expiry of the mandate as a Member of the Parliament – No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings – No need to adjudicate)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TB0236

62024TB0236

January 28, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C series

C/2025/2401

(Case T-236/24)

(Institutional law - Member of the Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Request for immunities to be defended - Expiry of the mandate as a Member of the Parliament - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)

(C/2025/2401)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Clara Ponsatí i Obiols (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: G. Boye and S. Bekaert, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz and J.-C. Puffer, acting as Agents)

Re:

By her action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decisions of the European Parliament, announced in Parliament on 26 February and 10 April 2024, by which it rejected her requests based on Rule 7 of the Rules of Procedure applicable to the ninth parliamentary term (2019-2024) seeking the defence of the immunity provided for in Article 9 of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union (OJ 2010 C 83, p. 266).

Operative part of the order

1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate.

2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Kingdom of Spain.

3.Each party shall bear its own costs.

4.The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs relating to its application for leave to intervene.

(1) OJ C C/2024/3791, 24.6.2024.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2401/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia