I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Institutional law - Member of the Parliament - Privileges and immunities - Request for immunities to be defended - Expiry of the mandate as a Member of the Parliament - No longer any legal interest in bringing proceedings - No need to adjudicate)
(C/2025/2401)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Clara Ponsatí i Obiols (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: G. Boye and S. Bekaert, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz and J.-C. Puffer, acting as Agents)
By her action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decisions of the European Parliament, announced in Parliament on 26 February and 10 April 2024, by which it rejected her requests based on Rule 7 of the Rules of Procedure applicable to the ninth parliamentary term (2019-2024) seeking the defence of the immunity provided for in Article 9 of Protocol (No 7) on the privileges and immunities of the European Union (OJ 2010 C 83, p. 266).
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Kingdom of Spain.
3.Each party shall bear its own costs.
4.The Kingdom of Spain shall bear its own costs relating to its application for leave to intervene.
—
(1) OJ C C/2024/3791, 24.6.2024.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2401/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—