EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-498/11: Action brought on 16 September 2011 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TN0498

62011TN0498

September 16, 2011
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

26.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 347/37

(Case T-498/11)

2011/C 347/68

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and M. Dermitzakis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

Annul the decision of the Publications Office of the European Union rejecting the offer submitted by the applicant in the tendering procedure-Invitation to specific tender no. 10369 ‘Revamping of the OLAF website’ implementing Competitive Multiple Framework Service Contract no. 10224 lot 1, and related decisions of the Publications Office including the one to award the respective contract to a sucessful tenderer and selected contractor;

Order the Publications Office to pay the applicant 31 977 EUR (euros) in damages;

In addition, order the Publications Office to pay the applicant 20 000 EUR (euros) in damages for the loss of opportunity and detriment to its reputation and credibility; and

Order the Publications Office to pay the applicant’s legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with present application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging the infringement of the obligation to state reasons pursuant to Article 100(2) of the Financial Regulation;

2.Second plea in law, alleging the infringement of the tender specifications, using the award criterion contrary to Article 97 of the Financial Regulation and 138 of the Implementing Rules; and

3.Third plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment, vague and unsubstantiated comments of the Evaluation Committee, modification of the award criteria included in the original call for tenders and not communicating to tenderers criteria introduced a posteriori in due time.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia