I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-341/18) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for aluminium electrolytic capacitors and tantalum electrolytic capacitors - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Price coordination throughout the EEA - Attribution to the parent company of the infringement committed by its subsidiary - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Gravity of the infringement - Increase in the amount of the fine for repeated infringement - Proportionality - Unlimited jurisdiction)
(2021/C 471/46)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Nec Corp. (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: O. Brouwer and A. Pliego Selie, lawyers, and by R. Bachour, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Cleenewerck de Crayencour, L. Wildpanner and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)
Application under Article 263 TFEU for, primarily, annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 1768 final of 21 March 2018 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 [TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.40136 — Capacitors), in so far as that decision finds that the applicant personally participated in the infringement, and, in the alternative, annulment of the fines imposed on the applicant or a reduction in the amount of those fines.
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Nec Corp. to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 294, 20.8.2018.