I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-104/14 P-INTP) (<a id="ntc1-C_2017078EN.01001702-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2017078EN.01001702-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>)
((Proceedings - Interpretation of the judgment))
(2017/C 078/23)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)
Other parties to the proceedings: Marco Verile (Cadrezzate, Italy) and Anduela Gjergji (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)
Request for interpretation of the judgment of 13 October 2015, Commission v Verile and Gjergji (T-104/14 P, EU:T:2015:776).
The Court:
1)Paragraph 3 of the operative part of the judgment of 13 October 2015, Commission v Verile and Gjergji (T-104/14), must be interpreted as meaning that it covers both the costs relating to the appeal proceedings and those relating to the proceedings at first instance;
2)Mr Marco Veril and Ms Anduela Gjergji, on the one hand, and the European Commission, on the other, shall each bear their own costs relating to the proceedings for interpretation;
3)The original of this judgment shall be appended to the original of the judgment interpreted in the margin of which reference shall be made to this judgment.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2017078EN.01001702-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2017078EN.01001702-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 151, 19.5.2014).