- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-356/14: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 5 November 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest Környéki Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Hunland-Trade Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Kereskedelmi Kft. v Földművelésügyi Miniszter (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Insufficiently detailed information as regards the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014CB0356
62014CB0356
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
19.1.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 16/14
(Case C-356/14) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 53(2) and 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Insufficiently detailed information as regards the factual and legislative context of the dispute in the main proceedings - Manifest inadmissibility)
(2015/C 016/21)
Language of the case: Hungarian
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Hunland-Trade Mezőgazdasági Termelő és Kereskedelmi Kft.
Defendant: Földművelésügyi Miniszter
Operative part of the order
The request for a preliminary ruling from the Budapest környéki közigazgatási és munkaügyi bíróság (Hungary), made by decision of 16 June 2014, in Case C-356/14, is manifestly inadmissible.
(1) OJ C 329, 22.9.2014.