- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-340/17: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Japan Airlines v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for airfreight — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport — Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) — Exchange of information — Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission — Article 266 TFEU — Limitation period — Rights of the defence — Non-discrimination — Single and continuous infringement — Amount of the fine — Value of sales — Gravity of the infringement — Additional amount — Mitigating circumstances — Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities — Substantially limited involvement — Proportionality — Unlimited jurisdiction)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62017TA0340
62017TA0340
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
23.5.2022
Official Journal of the European Union
C 207/28
(Case T-340/17) (*)
(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for airfreight - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport - Coordination of elements of the price of airfreight services (fuel surcharge, security surcharge, payment of commission on surcharges) - Exchange of information - Territorial jurisdiction of the Commission - Article 266 TFEU - Limitation period - Rights of the defence - Non-discrimination - Single and continuous infringement - Amount of the fine - Value of sales - Gravity of the infringement - Additional amount - Mitigating circumstances - Encouragement of the anticompetitive conduct by public authorities - Substantially limited involvement - Proportionality - Unlimited jurisdiction)
(2022/C 207/37)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Japan Airlines Co. Ltd (Tokyo, Japan) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis and K. Van Hove, lawyers, and R. Burton, Solicitor)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, G. Koleva and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents, and by J. Holmes QC)
Re:
Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 1742 final of 17 March 2017 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case AT.39258 — Airfreight) in so far as it relates to the applicant and, in the alternative, for a reduction in the amount of the fine imposed on the applicant.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Annuls Article 1(1)(h) and (4)(h) of Commission Decision C(2017) 1742 final of 17 March 2017 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU, Article 53 of the EEA Agreement and Article 8 of the Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation on Air Transport (Case AT.39258 — Airfreight);
2.Sets the amount of the fine imposed on Japan Airlines Co. Ltd in Article 3(h) of that decision at EUR 28 875 000;
3.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
4.Orders Japan Airlines to bear one third of its own costs;
5.Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay two thirds of the costs incurred by Japan Airlines.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.
ECLI:EU:C:2022:140