I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Case C-181/22 P)
(Appeal - Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the European Central Bank (ECB) - Article 24 - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Administrative review procedure - Decision repealing an earlier decision - Action for annulment - Continuing interest in bringing proceedings - Actions for damages - Manifest inadmissibility)
(C/2025/684)
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Nemea Bank plc (represented by: A. Meriläinen, asianajaja)
Other parties to the proceedings: Heikki Niemelä, Mika Lehto, Nemea plc, Nevestor SA, European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: D.M. Brinkman, C. Hernández Saseta and A. Witte, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented initially by: A. Nijenhuis and A. Steiblytė, and subsequently by A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)
The Court:
1.Sets aside points 1 and 3 of the operative part of the order of the General Court of the European Union of 20 December 2021, Niemelä and Others v ECB (T-321/17, EU:T:2021:942);
2.Dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;
3.Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for it to rule on the action for annulment brought by Nemea Bank plc;
4.Reserves the costs.
* Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 237, 20.6.2022.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/684/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
ECLI:EU:C:2025:140
15
* * *
Language of the case: English