- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-157/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LICHTYOGA) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark LICHTYOGA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62020TA0157
62020TA0157
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
29.3.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 110/29
(Case T-157/20) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark LICHTYOGA - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 110/33)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Gabriele Bachmann (Bad Grönenbach, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 December 2019 (Case R 2317/2019-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign LICHTYOGA as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Gabriele Bachmann to pay the costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 191, 8.6.2020.