- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-564/19: Judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020 —Lozano Arana and Others v EUIPO — Coltejer (LIBERTADOR) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark LIBERTADOR — Genuine use of the mark — Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Right to be heard — Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 — Due notification — Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (now Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Failure to produce proof of genuine use of the mark within the time limit prescribed — Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0564
62019TA0564
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
13.7.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 230/35
(Case T-564/19) (*)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark LIBERTADOR - Genuine use of the mark - Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Right to be heard - Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001 - Due notification - Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430 (now Article 60 of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) - Failure to produce proof of genuine use of the mark within the time limit prescribed - Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2017/1430 (now Article 19(1) of Delegated Regulation 2018/625)
(2020/C 230/44)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Antonio Lozano Arana (Cali, Colombia), Daniel Simon Benmaor (Marseilles, France), Marion Esther Benmaor (Marseilles), Valérie Brigitte Danielle Servant (Marrakesh, Morocco) (represented by: M. Angelier, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Coltejer SA (Itagüí, Colombia)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 June 2019 (Case R 2482/2018-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Coltejer and Mr Albert Benmaor and Mr Lozano Arana.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Antonio Lozano Arana, Mr Daniel Simon Benmaor, Ms Marion Esther Benmaor and Ms Valérie Brigitte Danielle Servant to pay the costs.
(*) Language of the case: English.
(1) OJ C 337, 7.10.2019.
ECLI:EU:C:2020:140