- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-482/13: Order of the General Court of 21 February 2018 — MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack v EUIPO — Cryo-Save (CryoDafe) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Withdrawal of the opposition — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0482
62013TB0482
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
30.4.2018
Official Journal of the European Union
C 152/34
(Case T-482/13) (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))
(2018/C 152/43)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG (Billerbeck, Germany) (represented by: A. Thünken, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Cryo-Save AG (Freienbach, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 July 2013 (Case R 1759/2012 4), relating to opposition proceedings between Cryo-Save AG and MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no longer any need to adjudicate in the action;
(<span class="note"> <a id="ntr1-C_2018152EN.01003402-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2018152EN.01003402-E0001">*1</a> </span>) OJ C 313, 26.10.2013.