EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-330/08: Order of the General Court of 14 February 2012 — Ligny Pesca di Guaiana Francesco and Others v Commission (Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 — Recovery plan for bluefin tuna — Setting TACs for 2008 — Act of general application — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissible)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62008TB0330

62008TB0330

February 14, 2012
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/12

(Case T-330/08) (1)

(Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 - Recovery plan for bluefin tuna - Setting TACs for 2008 - Act of general application - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissible)

2012/C 109/26

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Ligny Pesca di Guaiana Francesco e C. Snc (Trapani, Italy) and the six other applicants whose names are mentioned in an annex to the order (represented by: A. Clarizia, P. Ziotti, P. De Luca, A. Amatucci and R. Malinconico, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Banks and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of Article 1 and Article 3(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 530/2008 of 12 June 2008 establishing emergency measures as regards purse seiners fishing for bluefin tuna in the Atlantic Ocean, east of longitude 45° W, and in the Mediterranean Sea (OJ 2008 L 155, p. 9).

Operative part of the order

1.The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.Ligny Pesca di Guaiana Francesco e C. Snc and the six other applicants whose names appear in the annex are to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

(1) OJ C 272, 25.10.2008.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia