EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2008. # VDH Projektentwicklung GmbH and Edeka Handelsgesellschaft Rhein-Ruhr mbH v Commission of the European Communities. # Actions for failure to act - Commission not implementing the corrective mechanism under Article 3(2) of Directive 89/665/EEC - Natural and legal persons - Measures of direct and individual concern to them - Manifest inadmissibility. # Case T-185/08.

ECLI:EU:T:2008:225

62008TO0185

June 25, 2008
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case T-185/08)

Actions for failure to act – Commission not implementing the corrective mechanism under Article 3(2) of Directive 89/665/EEC – Natural and legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Manifest inadmissibility

Actions for failure to act – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Directive 89/665 (Arts 230, fourth para., EC and 232, third para., EC; Council Directive 89/665, Art. 3) (see paras 9-17)

Re:

ACTION for a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to act in that it failed, in relation to the conclusion of a public works contract between the town of Stolberg and Kaufland Stiftung & Co., and in relation to the award of a general commercial contract by Kaufland Stiftung & Co., to implement without delay the corrective mechanism provided for under Article 3 of Directive 89/665/EEC and to send the Federal Republic of Germany a notification under Article 3(2) of that directive.

Operative part.

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action as manifestly inadmissible;

2.Orders the applicants to bear their own costs.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia