EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-233/09: Action brought on 12 June 2009 — Access Info Europe v Council

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62009TN0233

62009TN0233

January 1, 2009
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

29.8.2009

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/40

(Case T-233/09)

2009/C 205/75

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Access Info Europe (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: O. Brouwer and J. Blockx, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the contested decision;

order the Council to pay the applicant’s costs pursuant to Article 87 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, including the costs of any intervening parties.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant seeks, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 (1), the annulment of the Council’s decision to refuse full access to document 16338/08, a note from the General Secretariat to the Working Party on Information concerning the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents. The Council has allegedly only granted the applicant access to a redacted version of this document, excluding those parts which enable the delegations making proposals for modifications to be identified.

The applicant submits that the contested decision should be annulled on the following grounds:

First, the applicant claims that the Council breached Article 4(3), first subparagraph of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 in that

(a)it failed to show how the disclosure of the names of the delegations would seriously undermine the institution’s decision-making process;

(b)it did not substantiate the risk that the delegations’ views would cease to be submitted in writing nor how this would seriously undermine the institution’s decision-making process; and in that

(c)it failed to take into account the overriding public interest in disclosure of the identity of the national delegations.

Second, the applicant submits that the Council violated the duty to state reasons as required by Article 253 EC and Articles 7(1) and 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001.

* * *

(1) Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia