- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-333/24: Action brought on 2 July 2024 – Huda Beauty v EUIPO – Schulz (déjà-vu)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0333
62024TN0333
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2024/4873
12.8.2024
(Case T-333/24)
(C/2024/4873)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Huda Beauty Ltd (Road Town, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: R. Drozdz and J. Wachinger, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Norbert Schulz (Hamburg, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark déjà-vu – EU trade mark No 2 214 492
Proceedings before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 April 2024 in Case R 2487/2022-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision in so far as it dismissed the application for revocation in relation to the goods in Class 3 ‘perfumery’ and ordered the parties to bear their own costs in the cancellation and appeal proceedings;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Plea in law
—Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4873/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—
* * *
Language of the case: German.