- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-421/07: Judgment of the General Court of 8 December 2011 — Deutsche Post v Commission (State aid — Measures taken by the German authorities in favour of Deutsche Post AG — Decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) EC — No prior definitive decision — Inadmissibility)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62007TA0421
62007TA0421
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
28.1.2012
Official Journal of the European Union
C 25/46
(Case T-421/07) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(State aid - Measures taken by the German authorities in favour of Deutsche Post AG - Decision to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88(2) EC - No prior definitive decision - Inadmissibility)
(2012/C 25/87)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Deutsche Post AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: J. Sedemund and T. Lübbig, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by N. Khan and B. Martenczuk, and subsequently by Martenczuk and D. Grespan, acting as Agents)
Interveners in support of the defendant: UPS Europe NV/SA (Brussels, Belgium); and UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG (Neuss, Germany) (represented by: T. Ottervanger and E. Henny, lawyers)
Re:
Application for annulment of the Commission decision of 12 September 2007 to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 88 (2) [EC] in respect of State aid granted by the Federal Republic of Germany to Deutsche Post AG (C 36/07 (ex NN 25/07))
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action as inadmissible;
2.Orders Deutsche Post AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
3.Orders UPS Europe NV/SA and UPS Deutschland Inc. & Co. OHG to bear their own costs.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 22, 26.1.2008.
* * *