- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-818/21 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 22 June 2023 — YG v European Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Official — Promotion — 2019 promotion exercise — Decision not to promote the appellant to grade AST 9 — Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Comparison of merits — Distortion of the evidence — Disregard for and distortion of the pleas in the application at first instance — Infringement of the rights of the defence — Failure to fulfil the duty to state reasons)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021CA0818
62021CA0818
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.8.2023
Official Journal of the European Union
C 278/7
(Case C-818/21 P) (<span class="oj-super oj-note-tag">1</span>)
(Appeal - Civil service - Official - Promotion - 2019 promotion exercise - Decision not to promote the appellant to grade AST 9 - Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Comparison of merits - Distortion of the evidence - Disregard for and distortion of the pleas in the application at first instance - Infringement of the rights of the defence - Failure to fulfil the duty to state reasons)
(2023/C 278/09)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: YG (represented by: A. Champetier and S. Rodrigues, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Radu Bouyon and L. Vernier, acting as Agents)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders YG to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
(<span class="oj-super">1</span>) OJ C 191, 10.5.2022.
Language of the case: English