I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
C series
—
(Case T-599/24)
(C/2025/273)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Applicant: LTV Leuchten & Lampen Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH (Brunn am Gebirge, Austria) (represented by: C. Pilz, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: XAL GmbH (Graz, Austria)
Proprietor of the design at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Design at issue: Community design ‘Lights’ – Community design No 2 175 802-0003
Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 September 2024 in Case R 1885/2023-3
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—amend the contested decision to the effect that the appeal of the other party to the proceedings (opponent) of 4 September 2023 is dismissed as unfounded and that the decision of the Invalidity Division of EUIPO of 8 August 2023 (invalidity proceedings No ICD 119 619) is upheld or reinstated in its entirety;
—order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay all recoverable costs incurred by the applicant in the present proceedings and in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal pursuant to Article 134(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
—Infringement of essential procedural requirements;
—Infringement of Article 6(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002;
—Misuse of powers.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/273/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—