EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber) of 12 September 2007.#William Prym GmbH & Co. KG and Prym Consumer GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities.#Competition - Cartels - European haberdashery market (needles) - Product market sharing - Geographic market sharing - Fine - Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Duty to state reasons - Gravity and duration of the infringement - Leniency notice.#Case T-30/05.

ECLI:EU:T:2007:267

62005TJ0030

September 12, 2007
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

(Case T-30/05)

Competition – Cartels – European haberdashery market (needles) – Product market sharing – Geographic market sharing – Fine – Guidelines on the method of setting fines – Duty to state reasons – Gravity and duration of the infringement – Leniency notice

4. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Measure of the actual capacity to cause significant damage to competition on the market concerned (Art. 81(1) EC; Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2)) (see para. 90)

6. Competition – Agreements, decisions and concerted practices – Agreements between undertakings – Effect on trade between Member States – Criteria – Market not significantly affected – Agreement not prohibited (Art. 81(1) EC) (see paras 102-103, 140)

8. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Duration of the infringement (Art. 81(1) EC; Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2)) (see paras 127-128, 133)

9. Competition – Community rules – Infringement committed by a wholly owned subsidiary – Imputed by presumption to the parent company (Art. 81 EC) (see para. 146)

10. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Power of assessment conferred on the Commission by Article 23 of Regulation No 1/2003 (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23) (see paras 153-156)

11. Community law – Principles – Non-retroactivity of penal provisions – Scope – Fines imposed for breach of the competition rules – Included (Council Regulation No 1/2003, Art. 23; Commission Notice 98/C 9/03) (see paras 164-168)

13. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Seriousness of the infringement – Attenuating circumstances (Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2); Commission Notice 98/C 9/03, point 3) (see paras 204-205, 207-208, 211)

14. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Obligation to take account of the financial situation of the undertaking concerned (Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2)) (see para. 230)

15. Competition – Fines – Amount – Determination – Criteria – Attitude of the undertaking during the administrative procedure (Council Regulation No 17, Art. 15(2); Commission Notice 96/C 207/04, Title D, point 2) (see paras 251-252)

Re:

APPLICATION, principally, for annulment of Commission Decision C(2004) 4221 final of 26 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F-1/38.338 – PO/Needles) in so far as it relates to the applicants, and, in the alternative, for annulment or reduction of the fine imposed on the applicants.

Operative part

The Court:

1.Sets the amount of the fine imposed on William Prym GmbH & Co. KG and Prym Consumer GmbH & Co. KG under Article 2 of Commission Decision C(2004) 4221 final of 26 October 2004 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] (Case COMP/F-1/38.338 – PO/Needles) at EUR 27 million;

2.Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;

3.Orders William Prym and Prym Consumer to bear 90% of their own costs and to pay 90% of the costs incurred by the Commission, and the Commission to bear 10% of its own costs and to pay 10% of the costs incurred by William Prym and Prym Consumer.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia