I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
(2023/C 54/24)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Applicant: Drinks Prod Srl (Păntășești, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac and V. Stănese, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Coolike-Regnery GmbH (Bensheim, Germany)
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark VIVIASEPT — Application for registration No 18 329 344
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 September 2022 in Case R 488/2022-5
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—oblige EUIPO to continue the registration proceedings for EUTM No. 18 329 344 (‘VIVIASEPT’) for all the requested goods and services from Classes 3 and 5.
—Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.