EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-605/21: Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2023 — TestBioTech v Commission (Environment — Genetically modified products — Genetically modified maize containing, consisting of or produced from MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and its subcombinations — Rejection of an application for internal review of an authorisation for placing on the market — Manifest error of assessment — Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Articles 4 to 6 and 16 to 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 — Article 5 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62021TA0605

62021TA0605

October 18, 2023
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

Series C

C/2023/1146

(Case T-605/21) (*)

(Environment - Genetically modified products - Genetically modified maize containing, consisting of or produced from MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and its subcombinations - Rejection of an application for internal review of an authorisation for placing on the market - Manifest error of assessment - Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Articles 4 to 6 and 16 to 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 - Article 5 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 503/2013)

(C/2023/1146)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: TestBioTech eV (Munich, Germany) (represented by: K. Smith, Barrister)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Galindo Martín and F. Castilla Contreras, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks annulment of the decision of the European Commission of 8 July 2021 rejecting the grounds set out in its request for internal review made pursuant to Article 10(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 September 2006 on the application of the provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community institutions and bodies (OJ 2006 L 264, p. 13), against Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/61 of 22 January 2021 authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of, or produced from genetically modified maize MON 87427 × MON 87460 × MON 89034 × MIR162 × NK603 and genetically modified maize combining two, three or four of the single events MON 87427, MON 87460, MON 89034, MIR162 and NK603, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2021 L 26, p. 12).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Dismisses the action;

2.Orders TestBioTech eV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

*

(*) Language of the case: English.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1146/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia