- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-597/14: Action brought on 11 August 2014 — Cham and Bena Properties v Council
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62014TN0597
62014TN0597
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 372/21
(Case T-597/14)
2014/C 372/26
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicants: Cham Holding Co. SA and Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat and C. Cornet D’Elzius, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the General Court should:
—declare the applicants’ action admissible and well founded;
—consequently, order the European Union to pay compensation for the loss suffered by the applicants arising from the suspension of the ‘Yasmeen Rotana’ project, in the region of EUR 43000000.
—order the appointment of an expert to establish the total amount of the loss suffered by the applicants;
—order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on 3 pleas in law that are in essence identical or similar to those relied on Case T-592/14, Makhlouf v Council.