- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-800/24 P: Appeal brought on 13 November 2024 by Tertianum Services AG against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 04 September 2024 in Case T-73/23, Tertianum v EUIPO – DPF (TERTIANUM)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024CN0800
62024CN0800
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/3861
21.7.2025
(Case C-800/24 P)
(C/2025/3861)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Appellant: Tertianum Services AG (represented by: S. Frohlich, M. Hartmann and H. Lerchl, Rechtsanwälte)
Other parties to the proceedings: Tertianum AG (represented by: S. Frohlich and M. Hartmann, Rechtsanwälte), European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Stoyanova-Valchanova, agent), DPF AG (represented by: A. Nordemann, Rechtsanwalt)
By order of 05 June 2025, the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was dismissed as manifestly inadmissible and that Tertianum Services AG, Tertianum AG, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and DPF AG shall bear their own costs.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/3861/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—