EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-193/19: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2021 — Achema and Achema Gas Trade v Commission (State aid — Aid to Litgas for the supply of a minimum quantity of LNG to the LNG terminal at the sea port of Klaipėda — Decision not to raise objections — Safeguarding procedural rights — EU framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation — Service of general economic interest — Compensation for a service of general economic interest — Boil-off costs — Balancing costs — Security of supply — Article 14 of Directive 2004/18/EC — Body of consistent evidence)

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TA0193

62019TA0193

September 8, 2021
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

C 452/20

(Case T-193/19) (*)

(State aid - Aid to Litgas for the supply of a minimum quantity of LNG to the LNG terminal at the sea port of Klaipėda - Decision not to raise objections - Safeguarding procedural rights - EU framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation - Service of general economic interest - Compensation for a service of general economic interest - Boil-off costs - Balancing costs - Security of supply - Article 14 of Directive 2004/18/EC - Body of consistent evidence)

(2021/C 452/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Achema AB (Jonava, Lithuania), Achema Gas Trade UAB (Jonava) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado, J. Wileur and N. Solárová, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and A. Bouchagiar, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Lithuania (represented by: K. Dieninis and R. Dzikovič, acting as Agents), Ignitis UAB, formerly Lietuvos energijos tiekimas UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: K. Kačerauskas, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2018) 7141 final of 31 October 2018 in State aid case SA.44678 (2018/N) — modification of aid for LNG terminal in Lithuania.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.Annuls Commission Decision C(2018) 7141 final of 31 October 2018 in State aid case SA.44678 (2018/N) relating to modification of aid for LNG terminal in Lithuania, in so far as the Commission decided not to raise objections to the State aid resulting from the 2016 amendments;

2.Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.Orders Achema AB, Achema Gas Trade UAB, the European Commission, the Republic of Lithuania and Ignitis UAB to bear their own costs.

(*) Language of the case: English.

(1) OJ C 206, 17.6.2019.

ECLI:EU:C:2021:140

* * *

Language of the case: English

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia