Official Journal of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/51

9.10.2023

(Case T-418/23)

(C/2023/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: YK (represented by: B. Maréchal, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—annul the final decision dated 5 April 2023 of the EIB President, endorsing the conclusions of the Final Report of the EIB Dignity at Work Panel in case no 2021/01-H (hereinafter, the ‘first disputed decision’);

—annul the final report of the EIB Dignity at Work Panel in case no 2021/01-H, dated 24 May 2022 (hereinafter, the ‘second disputed decision’ and together with the first disputed decision, the ‘disputed decisions’), and;

—compensate for non-material damages and distress that the applicant suffered as a result of multiple irregularities and continuous infringements of applicant’s fundamental rights directly relating to the disputed decisions and the processes initiated and/or followed by and/or agreed with the European Investment Bank relating to such disputed decisions.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging illegality of the disputed decisions following the defendant’s wrongful actions and/or omissions relating to the improper initiation, continuation and conduct of the dignity at work procedure.

2.Second plea in law, alleging illegality of the disputed decisions following the defendant’s actions and/or omissions in assessing the substance of allegations made against the applicant.

3.Third plea in law, alleging liability of the defendant for damages suffered by the applicant as a result of the disputed decisions and related violations of his fundamental rights.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/51/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)