EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-363/24: Action brought on 17 July 2024 – Ferngas Netzgesellschaft v Commission

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62024TN0363

62024TN0363

July 17, 2024
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2024/5242

(Case T-363/24)

(C/2024/5242)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Ferngas Netzgesellschaft mbH (Schwaig bei Nürnberg, Germany) (represented by: T. Richter and J. Funke-Kaiser, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the defendant’s decision of 26 March 2024, C(2024) 2041 final, in Case SA.112489 (2024/N);

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant alleges that the defendant infringed its participation rights. It submits that the defendant failed to initiate the formal investigation procedure pursuant to Article 4(4) of Regulation (EU) 2015/1589, (*) even though there were serious doubts as to the compatibility of the aid with the internal market.

The defendant authorised the aid recipient SEFE Securing Energy for Europe GmbH (SEFE) to acquire the remaining shares in WIGA under State aid law by approving a partial withdrawal of an acquisition prohibition agreed by Germany without taking into account the competitive effects on the infrastructure markets concerned, on which WIGA and the applicant are active. The defendant’s view, which is limited to the wholesale markets, fails to recognise the special situation existing in Germany that numerous gas transmission system operators are in competition with each other in a variety of ways, not least and currently in competition for investments in hydrogen network infrastructures.

Serious difficulties requiring the initiation of a formal investigation procedure are further indicated by the fact that the defendant’s assessment of the compatibility of the aid with the internal market is incomplete even under the requested modification of the commitments given because, although it mentions an appropriate standard of assessment, it does not apply it. In particular, the defendant does not examine whether the acquisition of WIGA is ‘indispensable’ within the meaning of the guidelines for rescuing and restructuring aid (**) to ensure the long-term viability of the aid recipient SEFE.

(*) Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (OJ 2015 L 248, p. 9).

(**) Communication from the Commission – Guidelines on State aid for rescuing and restructuring non-financial undertakings in difficulty (OJ 2014 C 249, p. 1).

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/5242/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia