I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Appeal – Figurative mark CRISTAL CASTELLBLANCH – Refusal of registration
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 8 December 2005 in Case T‑29/04 Castellblanch v OHIM in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action brought by the applicant for the figurative mark ‘CRISTAL CASTELLBLANCH’ for goods in Class 33 for annulment of Decision R 0037/2002-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 17 November 2003 dismissing the appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing to register that mark in the context of the opposition brought by the proprietor of national and international word marks containing the word ‘CRISTAL’ for goods in Class 33.
The appeal is dismissed.
Castellblanch SA is ordered to pay the costs.