- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-664/11: Order of the General Court of 6 December 2012 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — Royal Mediterranea (THAI SPA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Limitation of services covered by the Community trade mark application — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62011TB0664
62011TB0664
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C 32/18
(Case T-664/11)(<span class="super">1</span>)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Limitation of services covered by the Community trade mark application - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 32/28
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: L. de Brouwer, E. Cornu and É. De Gryse, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Royal Mediterranea, SA (Madrid, Spain)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 October 2011 (Case R 1976/2010-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV and Royal Mediterranea, SA.
Operative part of the order
1.There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
2.Each party shall bear its own costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.