- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-639/18: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 June 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Kiel — Germany) — KH v Sparkasse Südholstein (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Distance marketing of financial services — Directive 2002/65/EC — Article 1 — Scope — Contracts concerning financial services consisting of an initial agreement followed by successive operations — Application of Directive 2002/65/EC to the first agreement alone — Article 2(a) — Concept of ‘contract concerning financial services’ — Amendment to a loan agreement altering the interest rate initially set)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62018CA0639
62018CA0639
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
17.8.2020
Official Journal of the European Union
C 271/6
(Case C-639/18) (*)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Distance marketing of financial services - Directive 2002/65/EC - Article 1 - Scope - Contracts concerning financial services consisting of an initial agreement followed by successive operations - Application of Directive 2002/65/EC to the first agreement alone - Article 2(a) - Concept of ‘contract concerning financial services’ - Amendment to a loan agreement altering the interest rate initially set)
(2020/C 271/07)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: KH
Defendant: Sparkasse Südholstein
Operative part of the judgment
Article 2(a) of Directive 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 concerning the distance marketing of consumer financial services and amending Council Directive 90/619/EEC and Directives 97/7/EC and 98/27/EC must be interpreted as meaning that an agreed amendment to a loan agreement cannot be categorised as a ‘contract concerning financial services’, within the meaning of that provision, where the amendment does no more than alter the originally agreed rate of interest, but does not extend the term of the loan or alter its amount, and where the original clauses of the loan agreement provided for the agreement of such an amendment or, failing such agreement, the application of a variable interest rate.
(*)
Language of the case: German.
ECLI:EU:C:2020:140