EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.
Case T-218/16: Action brought on 9 May 2016 — Mühlbauer Technology v EUIPO (Magicrown)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62016TN0218
62016TN0218
May 9, 2016
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
27.6.2016
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 232/32
(Case T-218/16)
(2016/C 232/41)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Mühlbauer Technology GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Magicrown’ — Application No 13 627 641
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 March 2016 in Case R 1213/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO to pay the costs.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009
EurLex Case Law
AI-Powered Case Law Search
Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions
Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free TrialAt Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.