- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-441/13: Order of the General Court of 1 September 2015 — Makhlouf v Council (Action for annulment — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Error of assessment — Right to property — Right to respect for private life — Proportionality — Force of res judicata — Time-limit for bringing an action — Admissibility — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62013TB0441
62013TB0441
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
26.10.2015
Official Journal of the European Union
C 354/39
(Case T-441/13) (<span class="super">1</span>)
((Action for annulment - Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Error of assessment - Right to property - Right to respect for private life - Proportionality - Force of res judicata - Time-limit for bringing an action - Admissibility - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
(2015/C 354/47)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Eyad Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: C. Rygaert and G. Karouni, lawyers)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: G. Étienne and R. Liudvinaviciute-Cordeiro, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Council Decision 2013/255/CFSP of 31 July 2013 concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ L 147, p. 14), in so far as that decision concerns the applicant.
Operative part of the order
1.The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
2.Mr Eyad Makhlouf shall bear the costs.
(<span class="super">1</span>) OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.