- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-616/19 REV: Order of the General Court of 13 September 2021 — Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (Procedure — Application for revision — EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Action against a decision of EUIPO partially refusing to register a mark — Withdrawal of the opposition before service of the order dismissing the action — Fact unknown to the applicant and to the General Court — Revision of the order — No need to adjudicate)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62019TB0616(01)
62019TB0616(01)
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
15.11.2021
Official Journal of the European Union
C 462/43
(Case T-616/19 REV) (*)
(Procedure - Application for revision - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Action against a decision of EUIPO partially refusing to register a mark - Withdrawal of the opposition before service of the order dismissing the action - Fact unknown to the applicant and to the General Court - Revision of the order - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 462/51)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG (Emmerich am Rhein, Germany) (represented by: T. Schmitz, S. Stolzenburg-Wiemer, M. Breuer and I. Dimitrov, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium BV (Breda, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Tiemann and C. Elkemann, lawyers)
Re:
APPLICATION for revision of the order of 10 July 2020, Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19, not published, EU:T:2020:334).
Operative part of the order
1.The application for revision of the order of 10 July 2020, Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19, not published, EU:T:2020:334), is granted.
2.There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19).
3.Each party shall bear its own costs relating to the annulment proceedings in Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19).
4.The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs relating to the revision procedure.
5.EUIPO shall pay half of the costs of Katjes Fassin GmbH & Co. KG relating to the revision procedure.
6.Katjes Fassin shall bear half of its own costs relating to the revision procedure.
7.The registrar shall annex the original of the present order to the original of the order of 10 July 2020, Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19, not published, EU:T:2020:334).
8.The registrar shall make note of the present order in the margin of the order of 10 July 2020, Katjes Fassin v EUIPO — Haribo The Netherlands & Belgium (WONDERLAND) (T-616/19, not published, EU:T:2020:334).
(*) Language of the case: German.