EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Case T-144/25: Action brought on 2 March 2025 – WS v EDPS

ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025TN0144

62025TN0144

March 2, 2025
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Official Journal of the European Union

EN

C series

C/2025/2230

22.4.2025

(Case T-144/25)

(C/2025/2230)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: WS (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Data Protection Supervisor

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

annul the decision of the EDPS to close the applicant’s complaint against EUIPO, concerning the exercise of several rights under the EUDPR, submitted to the EDPS on 25/11/2024, without further investigation or action;

order EDPS to pay an adequate compensation to the applicant in the discretion of the Court, in the applicant’s view not less than EUR 1,500, for the moral and immaterial damages suffered by the applicant as a result of the decision of the EDPS;

order EDPS to pay the procedural costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

1.First plea in law, alleging that the defendant breached the applicant’s right to have the EDPS fulfil the duties under Article 52(2), (3) and Article 57 (1a), (1c) and (1e) of the EUDPR in favour of the applicant, in particular by not investigating the subject matter of the applicant’s complaint and/or acting against the non-compliance of EUIPO with (at least) Articles 14, 17, 20, 23 of the EUDPR.

2.Second plea in law, alleging that the applicant has suffered damage consisting of (a) being placed in a state of continual insecurity about how his personal data is being managed by EUIPO as a direct consequence of the failure of the EDPS to assist the applicant in the exercise of his rights under the EUDPR and of (b) the applicant’s position in any legal (past and future) action against EUIPO being weakened due to the lack of an investigation from the EDPS and the lack of any kind of information that would allow the applicant to verify the lawfulness of the data processing activities carried out by EUIPO.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2230/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia