I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
—
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark UC - Earlier EU figurative mark UC - Right to be heard - Principle of impartiality - Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal - Article 27(2) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(C/2024/4086)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Hanns Pfriem (Schweinfurt, Germany) (represented by: M. Pütz-Poulalion, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: U-Control Srl (Torrile, Italy) (represented by: N. Amadei, lawyer)
By his action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment and alteration of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 16 March 2023 (Case R 1404/2022-4).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Mr Hanns Pfriem, in addition to bearing his own costs, to pay those incurred by U-Control Srl;
3.Declares that the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs.
—
OJ C 261, 24.7.2023.
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/4086/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—