- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-315/15: Action brought on 13 May 2015 — Vince v OHIM (ELECTRIC HIGHWAY)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62015TN0315
62015TN0315
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
7.12.2015
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 406/31
(Case T-315/15)
(2015/C 406/32)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Dale Vince (Gloucestershire, United Kingdom) (represented by: B. Longstaff, barrister)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ELECTRIC HIGHWAY’ — Application for registration No 010655819
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2015 in Case R 1442/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—allow the applicant’s application for the mark to proceed in full to registration;
—order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant.
Pleas in law
—Incorrect interpretation of the meaning of the mark in relation to Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
—Incorrect interpretation of the relevant services in Class 39;
—The meaning of the mark asserted by the Board does not describe the services in any event;
—Incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.