EUR-Lex & EU Commission AI-Powered Semantic Search Engine
Modern Legal
  • Query in any language with multilingual search
  • Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
  • See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Start free trial

Similar Documents

Explore similar documents to your case.

We Found Similar Cases for You

Sign up for free to view them and see the most relevant paragraphs highlighted.

Order of the Court of 18 February 1960. # De Gezamenlijke Steenkolenmijnen in Limburg v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community. # Case 30-59.

ECLI:EU:C:1960:6

61959CO0030

February 18, 1960
With Google you find a lot.
With us you find everything. Try it now!

I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!

Valentina R., lawyer

Avis juridique important

61959O0030

European Court reports French edition Page 00091 Dutch edition Page 00093 German edition Page 00099 Italian edition Page 00089 English special edition Page 00048 Spanish special edition Page 00049

Parties

++++

IN CASE 30/59

HAVING REGARD TO THE APPLICATION MADE BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY ON 14 DECEMBER 1959 TO INTERVENE IN THE PROCEEDINGS PENDING BEFORE THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES BETWEEN

Grounds

HAVING REGARD TO THE WRITTEN OBSERVATIONS SUBMITTED BY THE PARTIES IN THE MAIN ACTION;

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY HAS ESTABLISHED AN INTEREST IN THE RESULT OF THE CASE SUBMITTED TO THE COURT, PURSUANT TO THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE ECSC STATUTE.

THE APPLICATION TO INTERVENE IS, UNDER THE SECOND PARAGRAPH OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE ECSC STATUTE, ADMISSIBLE IF IT SEEKS TO SUPPORT OR REQUEST REJECTION OF THE SUBMISSIONS OF ONE OF THE PARTIES IN THE MAIN ACTION, THE ADMISSIBILITY OR OTHERWISE OF INTERVENTION BEING DETERMINED SOLELY BY ITS PURPOSE AND NOT BY THE NATURE OF THE SUBMISSIONS RELIED UPON BY THE INTERVENER.

THE SUBMISSION OF THE APPLICATION TO INTERVENE DOES NOT HAVE THE EFFECT OF ENTITLING THE PARTY MAKING THE APPLICATION TO INTERVENE IN THE PROCEDURE IN THE MAIN ACTION; THIS RESULT CAN BE PRODUCED ONLY THROUGH THE ORDER OF THE COURT ALLOWING THE INTERVENER TO INTERVENE.

THE INTERVENER, UNTIL HIS INTERVENTION HAS BEEN ALLOWED, MAY DRAW UP HIS APPLICATION IN A LANGUAGE OTHER THAN THAT OF THE CASE IN THE MAIN ACTION.

IT IS ONLY WHEN HIS INTERVENTION IS ALLOWED THAT, WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO THE APPLICATION OF PARAGRAPH 2 ( C ) OF ARTICLE 29 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF 3 MARCH 1959, THE INTERVENER IS OBLIGED TO USE THE LANGUAGE OF THE CASE REQUIRED IN THE MAIN ACTION.

Operative part

COMPOSED OF : A . M . DONNER, PRESIDENT, L . DELVAUX AND R . ROSSI, PRESIDENTS OF CHAMBERS, O . RIESE AND CH . L . HAMMES, JUDGES,

ADVOCATE-GENERAL : K . ROEMER

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR : H . J . EVERSEN

HEREBY MAKES THE FOLLOWING ORDER.

1 . THAT THE GOVERNMENT OF THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY BE ALLOWED TO INTERVENE;

2 . THAT A COPY OF EACH PLEADING BE SERVED ON THE INTERVENER BY THE REGISTRAR; 3 . THAT THE COSTS BE RESERVED.

EurLex Case Law

AI-Powered Case Law Search

Query in any language with multilingual search
Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly

Get Instant Answers to Your Legal Questions

Cancel your subscription anytime, no questions asked.Start 14-Day Free Trial

At Modern Legal, we’re building the world’s best search engine for legal professionals. Access EU and global case law with AI-powered precision, saving you time and delivering relevant insights instantly.

Contact Us

Tivolska cesta 48, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia