- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-151/25, Viaudret: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 20 February 2025 – F.B. v Région wallonne
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62025CN0151
62025CN0151
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
EN
C series
—
C/2025/2518
12.5.2025
(Case C-151/25, Viaudret)
(C/2025/2518)
Language of the case: French
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: F.B.
Defendant: Région wallonne
Interveners: Parc éolien de Leuze-en-Hainaut SA, e-NosVents SA, Electrabel SA
Questions referred
In a legal system in which the operation of an activity referred to in Annex I to the Aarhus Convention (2) requires an operation permit granted for a maximum period of 20 years,
—must Article 6(1) and (10) [of,] and points 20 and 22 of Annex I to[,] the Aarhus Convention be interpreted as meaning that a decision to extend by 10 years the operation of the activity initially authorised for 20 years must be subject to a public participation phase?
—must Article 6(1) and (10) of the Aarhus Convention be interpreted as meaning that a legal system in which the procedure for extending the operation of the activity by 10 years never involves a public participation phase is not compatible with that article?
—
The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters (Aarhus Convention) (OJ 2005 L 124, p. 4).
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2518/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—