I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case C-601/12 P)(1)
((Appeal - Dumping - Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Second subparagraph of Article 2(7)(c) - Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China - Market economy treatment - Time-limit for adoption of the related decision exceeded - Effect))
2014/C 112/13
Language of the case: English
Appellant: Ningbo Yonghong Fasteners Co. Ltd (represented by: F. Graafsma and J. Cornelis, advocaten)
Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-P. Hix and S. Boelaert, Agents, assisted by G. Berrisch, Rechtsanwalt), European Commission (represented by: M. França and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents), and European Industrial Fasteners Institute AISBL (EIFI) (represented by: J. Bourgeois, avocat)
Appeal brought against the judgment of 10 October 2012 in Case T-150/09 Ningbo Yonghong Fasteners Co. Ltd v Council, by which the General Court (Seventh Chamber) dismissed an action for the partial annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 of 26 January 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2009 L 29, p. 1).
The Court:
1.Dismisses the appeal;
2.Orders Ningbo Yonghong Fasteners Co. Ltd to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union in the present proceedings;
3.Orders the European Commission and the European Industrial Fasteners Institute AISBL (EIFI) each to bear its own costs.
(1)
OJ C 71, 9.3.2013.