I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
—
(2015/C 205/51)
Language of the case: French
Appellant: Claudio Necci (Auderghem, Belgium) (represented by S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
—Annul the order of the European Civil Service Tribunal of 25 March 2015 in Case F-5/15 Necci v Commission;
—Refer the matter back to the European Civil Service Tribunal.
In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on two pleas in law.
1.First plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to effective judicial protection, since the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) dismissed the action for annulment brought by the applicant on the ground of inadmissibility which it classified as ‘manifest’.
2.Second plea in law, alleging an error of law committed by the CST in that it held that the time-limit for bringing proceedings under Article 90 of the Staff Regulations started to run from receipt of the proposal for the bonus loading of the annuities and not from its acceptance by the member of staff.
—