- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case C-217/23, Laghman: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 27 March 2025 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof – Austria) – Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl v A N (Reference for a preliminary ruling – Area of freedom, security and justice – Common asylum policy – Directive 2011/95/EU – Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be eligible for refugee status – Article 2(d) – Reasons for persecution – Article 10(1)(d) – Concept of membership of a particular social group – Condition relating to the perception of the group as being different by the surrounding society in the country of origin – Qualification for subsidiary protection – Article 2(f) – Concept of serious harm – Article 15(a) and (b) – Persons who are part of the same family and are targeted by a blood feud because of their family relationship)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62023CA0217
62023CA0217
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
Official Journal of the European Union
C series
—
C/2025/2823
(Case C-217/23,
Laghman)
(2)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Common asylum policy - Directive 2011/95/EU - Conditions that must be fulfilled by third-country nationals in order to be eligible for refugee status - Article 2(d) - Reasons for persecution - Article 10(1)(d) - Concept of ‘membership of a particular social group’ - Condition relating to the perception of the group as being different by the surrounding society in the country of origin - Qualification for subsidiary protection - Article 2(f) - Concept of ‘serious harm’ - Article 15(a) and (b) - Persons who are part of the same family and are targeted by a blood feud because of their family relationship)
(C/2025/2823)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Parties to the main proceedings
Appellant on a point of law: Bundesamt für Fremdenwesen und Asyl
Interested party: A N
Operative part of the judgment
Article 10(1)(d) of Directive 2011/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on standards for the qualification of third-country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection, for a uniform status for refugees or for persons eligible for subsidiary protection, and for the content of the protection granted
must be interpreted as meaning that an applicant for international protection targeted by a blood feud in his or her country of origin because of his or her status as a member of a family involved in a property dispute may not, for that reason alone, be regarded as belonging to a ‘particular social group’ within the meaning of that provision.
—
(1) OJ C 261, 24.7.2023.
(2) The name of the present case is a fictitious name. It does not correspond to the real name of any party to the proceedings.
—
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2823/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
—