I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
(Case T-85/16) (<a id="ntc1-C_2018142EN.01004201-E0001" href="#ntr1-C_2018142EN.01004201-E0001"> (<span class="super note-tag">1</span>)</a>)
((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark consisting of two parallel stripes on a shoe - Earlier EU figurative mark representing three parallel stripes on a shoe - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
(2018/C 142/54)
Language of the case: English
Applicant: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (Oudenaarde, Belgium) (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: adidas AG (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: I. Fowler and I. Junkar, Solicitors)
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 November 2015 (Case R 3106/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between adidas and Shoe Branding Europe.
1.Dismisses the action;
2.Orders Shoe Branding Europe BVBA to pay the costs.
(<a id="ntr1-C_2018142EN.01004201-E0001" href="#ntc1-C_2018142EN.01004201-E0001">(<span class="super">1</span>)</a> OJ C 136, 18.4.2016)