- Query in any language with multilingual search
- Access EUR-Lex and EU Commission case law
- See relevant paragraphs highlighted instantly
Similar Documents
Explore similar documents to your case.We Found Similar Cases for You
Case T-454/22: Action brought on 22 July 2022 — Sky v EUIPO — Skyliners (SKYLINERS)
ECLI:EU:UNKNOWN:62022TN0454
62022TN0454
With us you find everything. Try it now!
I imagine what I want to write in my case, I write it in the search engine and I get exactly what I wanted. Thank you!
Valentina R., lawyer
EN
Official Journal of the European Union
C 340/55
(Case T-454/22)
(2022/C 340/74)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Sky Ltd (Isleworth, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Zalewska-Orabona, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Skyliners GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark SKYLINERS — Application for registration No 14 570 915
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2022 in Case R 0006/2022-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—annul the contested decision;
—order EUIPO and, in case the other party joins the proceedings, the intervener, to bear the costs incurred by the applicant.
Pleas in law
—Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(5) and 8(4) in conjunction with Article 41(1)(a) and (c) and Article 8(2) of Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009;
—Infringement of Article 27(4) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 in conjunction with Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
—Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.